I'm
guessing that
Hymenal Opening sampled internet-sources on the
"Red Hymen" CD. The track
"Rebound Fuck Whore And Her Happy Relationship" at 1:08 sounds exactly like it could be sourced from an online stream made by a teen girl (or at least a convincing fiction). If anyone wants to comment and correct me, please do.
Quote from: FreakAnimalFinland on January 15, 2026, 12:18:48 PMbut most often what really matter is what is inside the book, not book as format and as means of experiencing the world?
As far as I interpret Mr. Freak Animal here, his question challenges Mr. Henteleff's thesis statement that
creative works which incorporate the internet effectively will become more relevant, and those that do not will seem antiquated.
Well, shouldn't we find sample material for noise useful primarily as raw material? Why should internet-sourced material be more valuable than... real life field recordings? And other offline material? It would be silly to suggest that all noise which does not incorporate the always-more-prolific internet shall therefore become antiquated, when any sample, from anywhere, could be good in the right hands. Perhaps what CANNOT become antiquated will always just be GOOD NOISE.
For some the internet proves indeed a joyless source for sampling, too commercial a space to plunder. I plunder lyrics and titles from physical erotica because I enjoy holding books far, far more than doomscrolling past the Instagram foot models, whose pictures are not worth a thousand words, but something else. I don't compose lyrics and titles with my dick in my hand, clicking past 99.9% generic PornHub videos. Hell, maybe I should, but it's hard to turn the pages.
P.S. Could TikTok videos be useful for noise? For instance, I can imagine
"Rebound Fuck Whore And Her Happy Relationship" sampling an online stream, even if it does not, which supports the idea of the internet as a potential gold mine for noise, but probably only if you make damn sure you know where to look, and how to use what you find.
