Quote from: brutalist_tapes on December 29, 2021, 11:50:38 PM
i think that this idea that the recipient is the one who decides the works intent is a new one, and partly comes from post-modern theorizing, but i could be wrong. you could say that the time for those kinds of provokation are over, and i would kind of aggree.
I think times of provocations are definitely not over. There are perhaps couple ways to look at it. One fact is, that people ARE provoked. They are reacting to obscenities of noise even stronger than ever before. So time of provocations over? I doubt it.
I think any art is subject to speculation of intent, observation and questioning the meaning and purpose of the works. If art was to be as blatantly clear as carrying sign at demonstration, it wouldn't be "art" in same way. So viewer experiencing and seeing art(or PE) from their own perspective is just fine with me. I think this active thinking, actively seeking meaning, actively USING art, even in ways it was not meant to, has been crucial in industrial-noise. Its not like it would teach you what to think, but more as how to approach.
More relevant question would be is the reaction of audience something that artists wants it to be? Or is there any particular thing he wants?
It may be relevant question, if there really is some particular purpose or reason for mentioned art piece. If you try to achieve something in particular, but whatever is done, it appears that presenting obscenities has very little thoughtful response, and mostly just sharp division to:
-guys who will consumer whatever nasty that is regurgitated on their direction, simply taking it as-it-is.
-guys who will reject it as repulsive bullshit they want nothing to do with.
Then question will be, does it matter? If response for creation is something else than you hope for?
And also, can the artist handle the abuse, slander, "cancellation", "misunderstanding" that can wait? Or that the nuance and thought behind release is thrown out by both parties. The fanboys of vile shit, and the.. opposite?
I tend to think, when piece of art is thrown in public, it is really out of our hands. It's hard to dictate how it should be seen. And even more importantly, that power electronics makers
have to be able to take this abuse and blame. If you don't have guts to be spat upon and "disliked", then better to things that people like. If you rather cherish opportunities on artists career, than making it all burn in bright light, there is option to stand in line. I don't know what exactly could be "achieved" in noise, if one is ready to sacrifice own vision and personality for it.