I used to have plenty of "dislikes" or some sort of prejudice for certain packagings. Digipak I disliked that it may start to get wear and damage. Digisleeves or cardboard sleeves, I was thinking what if disc gets scratched? In reality, when I look my collection, there is ZERO cd's that has been scratched in a way you could call it "damage". Out of thousands of digipak CD's, I don't know do I have any that has broken tray? I know it could happen, but I don't think I have any. So, my former dislikes have become way way less and been publishing plenty of digipaks and there will be more of "cd gatefold cover" type of releases. I like them for compact size, light weight, and as explained, I have personally never managed to seriously scratch CD's or damage the covers, so I no longer feel "stressed" if someone else can't handle his physical media properly, hah...
There is also a lot of people who have almost autistic need of uniformity. Band discography in same format, next to eachother. Label known of jewelbox CD, making digipak and its horror. Label known for norelco case tapes and suddenly comes weird oversized object and don't know what to do with it and where to put it, hah.. I, in the other hand, have grown little tired of "series". Uniformity and look-a-like, and I have no problem with digipak or jewelbox, but in genre where packaging and design have been utterly innovative, endless flood of same format is HANDY, but less exciting.
Like thinking the impact of early days TESCO CD's - for example. Unique item after unique item. And sometimes very simple way. Iugula-Thor mCD or Contagious Orgasm CD or such. Fits fine with jewelboxes and digipaks, but.. are not standard. These days it is vastly more rare to get the "wow" feeling from CD packaging. I don't say one would absolute need that from every CD. Sometimes being handy and convenient for the purpose is good.