Quote from: death persuader on July 04, 2020, 06:47:04 AM
I was late to find noise, but the biggest reason behind the intrigue for me was how perfect the medium was/is to express genuine malcontent, disgust, despondency, etc.
1) It could be argued that the above may relate to Industrial and Power Electronics but not to Noise. That this lack of communication is what differentiates Noise from these other genres. That the very nature of noise prevents communication, and so is generally elsewhere unwanted. What is missing in noise is any meaning in the noise itself. If any is to be given the "Artist" has to resort to packaging.
That in the work of the originators, Merzbow, The Rita, Vomir et al. there is no (obvious) expression.
2 ) It could be further argued that what differentiates personal 'taste' from 'Art' is that the former is mere sensation the latter a disinterested aesthetic contemplation and judgement of a work. That the former is simply a 'style' to produce some sensual response and the latter a genre which provokes an aesthetic experience. And such indeterminate judgements can be universal, unlike 'taste'. This then delineates 'Art' from self (or anything other) expression.
3) In the case of noise, 'Noise' marks such a move from style and self expression to 'Art'. Hence the academic interest.
It could be argued and I don't think its as clear cut as that, (as Kant would have it) but that could be what is now missing. And there are obvious problems with elitism snobbery and such. So maybe now in the 21st C this idea of Kant's should be abandoned and ignored in favour of a purely subjective hegemony.