I don't think people dismiss every problematic project. Sometimes it is obvious that release is merely designed "for the fans of..." -audience and if you are not that audience, then barely reasons to check them out?
Sometimes, if label boss, compilation curator or artists can't seem to differentiate between what is good and what is not, I would suppose it will have its results. That is valid criticism all around the scene.
Something such as Plantation, not bad. There is even releases on.. lets say, legit noise labels. I have distributed handful of them. Best stuff lives up to level people actually want the stuff.
One could assume people who like for example Brethren and Deathkey, might like many of bands from this "scene", but would there be some utterly remarkable album from there that stands next to monuments of power electronics or noise history? I do not know. At least I have not seen such things.
My own criticism is mostly that what "PEAC" refers to, RAC, appears so vastly different phenomena. It is like comparing online siege culture meme trolling with daily life revolutionary social movement. Edgy and sketchy semi-private releases fine with me. To get more praise from noise scene often requires that one just have to make really damn good noise.
