We certainly discuss it because of Whitehouse connection.
I think the curious point WB has mentioned before, and also mentions in linked radio interview, is that he considers it blessing he came from "outside", not really growing inside/along genre of music. So his approach is different. In a way I have some respect for this - as opposed to shallow copycat bands simply following expectations of genre.
But to say, this would be guaranteed better route - I strongly agree. It appears quite clear, that the guys who simply are not interested and do not follow what is being done, can't really put things in perspective. Their "new" or "mindblowing" thing might have been routine for decades. Their neat sounds with wonderful new tools may purely accidental. At one point of history you end up with Korg ms-10 or WASP... In next moment you have kaos pad and generic plug-ins with laptop. You go for it, and it comes out good or bad.
Especially Whitehouse is far more than just accident based on getting "wasp synth". That tool or even better tools, have been in hands of thousands, who failed to go as far as Whitehouse. But there are great number of examples where people just "lost it" - at least when looking from perspective of listener. And it appears to have a lot to do with not being really interested in type of music in general. Or not been into it for several decades, and then just return to do "my own thing". Which very often falls miserably low when perspective of level just isn't there and nothing is pushing forward. (see quality control discussion)
cut hands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GglYtHJhBhYtest dept:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seYltGfnrhQcut hands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HorXEtSM3xgRapoon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2daKDHBxV8&feature=relatedcut hands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YyUOf9lDjgDissecting Table:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUop-xx_otY&feature=relatedWinterkälte:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggObjVux-t4&feature=relmfuCut Hands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmbEBIm7r0Qetc.. Of course these are not "the same", but certainly as much same as saying all noise or PE is poorly rehashing ideas.
Of course there being good bands, doesn't exclude possibility of CH being also good, but it appears to me, that this whole "tribal industrial" thing that's been going since.. I don't know, early 80's, has used pretty much every idea but in less technologically flat methods. And the new innovations found it CH's work is most of all in ears who have not followed what has been done for decades.
Certainly I approve that artists who has gained some status by delivering exceptionally good material - will automatically be noticed and discussed much more than some new guy. But obviously the
war of life, should dominate that every moment is the struggle where artists needs to prove excellency. If it's based merely on past achievements, it simply should die soon on natural causes. I'm sure it will happen to many of who have done "come backs", when span of attention simply is drying up. Theirs and audiences.
Most of these "new" things, be it Prurient that sounds like late 80's Controlled Bleeding or something.. it's new and innovative for those who have missed the big picture of genre. Nowadays it's so damn easy to find stuff, new and old, that I would recommend those who are blown away by some "gimmick", check out past where such gimmick may have blossomed in natural creative flow.