Into the cans and have given up trying to gather the assorted threads below into anything approaching coherence, so...
In "The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious", Freud speculates that humor is essentially a form of aggression, what one might term the psychological sodomizing - "stripping" - of the butt (of the joke). This was published in 1905, two years after Psychopathia Sexualis was first translated into English (just to offer a random time referent). One would have a very hard time persuading anyone, including your mother, that early Whitehouse (for ready example) was anything but very intentionally humorous.
Not to neglect either the recent study that suggests that the most insanely funny comedians have high level psychotic traits:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/humor-sapiens/201407/do-comedians-possess-bipolar-traitsa "What is perhaps surprising is the very high scores comedians achieved on these scales compared to other creative people."
Given that most any sense of the humorous is largely culturally imbedded, one is certainly playing with fire when attempting the deliberately "funny" at an international festival. (When Whitehouse has played in Japan, the most common adjective used by the locals to describe net impression is "funny". Funny? Hell, yeah. And even if one were to get real po-faced about the shit what response might otherwise be expected? Some shirtless white dude, refugee from an episode of Cops*, yelling incomprehensible nonsense over a bunch of synth vomit of which the only discernible lyric is "Suck my cock!" This – again, very widely-held- impression was summarized very nicely in the Gero contribution to Extreme Music From Japan. Etc.)
Still I can see where objections may start. In general, with reference to just about anything, it is easier to dismiss the deliberately stupid or funny. "Merzbow" / lowest arts (porn) could be a viable (preemptive) response but so to Roemer-esque statements like "I have no sense of humor". A (noise) war was (is still?) being fought to establish the legitimacy of the venture. Good luck there.
At the same time, the Cementimental phrase "hilarious
but (also as genuinely intense and powerful) [emphasis added]" kinda gives away the game. Why not hilarious
and genuinely intense and powerful?
* proof positive that more crimes are committed by shirtless people