Just a couple of points. The idea that the virus in Italy is a different one, a mutation from the Chinese, i've not come across. Even so this doesn't explain the extreme difference in the volume of cases in Italy to other countries where the source has been traced to Italy?
As for mortality rates, if in some cases the effects of the virus are minimal, and I think that is the case, and so not reported, the % will be biased. More so if there is a greater tendency to report illness or not within a social group.
As for the virus being more deadly than flu, between 1,000 & 2,000 deaths in the UK from flu a year. 1,000 road deaths, 6,000 deaths from accidents in the home. I'm not saying it isn't deadly, or more so, i'm more confused by the data.
Finally! It is sometimes the case that the record of death might be recorded as due to the virus or some underlying condition. And this might differ in different health services. e.g. someone terminally ill with cancer, days or hours to live might catch the virus and so death be recorded as due to the virus, or due to the cancer? I had a relative in which this was the case, not cancer or the virus, but Parkinsons, cause of death was recorded as choking.
The toilet roll thing! And the sales of Anti*Bacterial*Handwash. Anyway the anti viral stuff needs 60% alcohol I see? So Vodka is no good. Is there anyone here who could tell me – would something like methylated spirits or turps do the job. I understand the alcohol works by destroying the virus' fatty membrane?