There was never any implication in my comment that his actions weren't premeditated, I think it sort of goes without saying that it (obviously) was. For one, I don't understand how wanting more questions answered before trying to seriously imagine a viable motive equates with deflecting blame elsewhere (seriously??), and two, you seem to feel that "blame" is an important factor here for reasons that escape me. I think "blame" can be determined when you have more facts. Third, what some guy in Vegas killing 50 innocent people has to do with my own "self-denial" and "self-image" is rather abstract, not sure what you really mean by that. If you're just implying that society helps create violent folks, well, duh.