haha!
Well, of course it could be interesting to some extent, but when there is relatively small group of people, I think results may not be utterly reliable or give any significant results. From some qualities we can make generalizations, but from others probably absolutely nothing.
How far one could go this type of general observation, before it ends up to be "noise cribs" type?
I do remember for example CITY/RUINS document of Cleveland underlining very much how blue collar (working class) the scene is there. My general impression would be western scene is rather dominated by white (lower-)middleclass men at 20-40's? Even bohemic society drop-outs rather fit to middleclass status.
When you see kids that are spoiled with wealth, easiness, or such, I think this can happen in other levels. It may not be the parents, but simply spoiled by urban environment with plenty of stimulants of all sorts and you will never end up in same ways creating things out of having pretty much nothing. I think for example organizing shows in nowadays something like that. At least over here, we're spoiled with having EVERY somehow significant bands and plenty of bands more, on pretty much every possible day - most often brought by professional organizers. Why bother to do anything when everything is done? In small city it could be very different. Either you do it, or it doesn't happen.
