Quote from: Zeno Marx on July 06, 2016, 11:37:12 PM
Quote from: DBL on July 06, 2016, 08:57:11 PM
as a boringly old fan, recent tapes have better sound quality - likely pro reproduction rather than tape to tape copying.
This has not been my experience in the past and especially now. Pro dubbing is all done on high-speed machines, and a lot of places use Type I tape. Neither make for great copying. From my understanding, it is common for dubbing facilities to not have stereo capabilities. They mono it and mirror it over to the other channel. I've had great dubbing luck with average quality machines in real time with Type II blanks.
Those hi-speed dubbing machines are more often used in a DIY context by labels, so if something is not "pro printed" IE with imprints on the shells, I suspect someone is using a worn out dubber (they wear out fast), and saying it is "pro dubbed".
The experience I have had with pro tapes is very good. It is exactly what I want from a tape; A minimal amount of hiss, good dynamics, and I can use Chrome, Cobalt, Type II High Bias, or whatever, for not much of a price difference. Very good dynamics, since we are still talking about relatively lo-fidelity compared to CD, but I will admit, I am a believer in the whole "warmth" thing. I think tapes and vinyl have a more organic quality to them, especially when rendered from analog sources.
I just want to say, I don't have any nostalgia for tapes, they have never left my realm. I bought only cassettes up until 2001 or so, mainly because discmen skipped too much, among other things, but this new fad of people "only buying tapes" is just vapid and tedious to me, for someone to broadly dismiss another person's work, even their favorite artists, because of format. Plain silly.
That said, I continue to listen to cassettes because walkmans are cheap. I haven't had the best of luck with dual tape decks since the one I had since childhood finally died last year.