Tough Guy PE/Industrial

Started by HONOR_IS_KING!, July 07, 2020, 09:16:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ImpulsyStetoskopu

#75
Quote from: FreakAnimalFinland on July 16, 2020, 09:45:43 AM
Well... if you look how people have been debating and arguing over what is "art" for ages. Mostly for last couple hundred years. With no ability to get into any real conclusion. One can just see that Con-Dom belongs to the lineage of avantgarde art and industrial. Where as many people are from what is simplifiedly said product of splintering pop culture. How the urge and motivation differs vastly. If you go to show, expecting to enjoy loud noise - it may be fulfilled also in Con-Dom set, yet he is not a "noise maker". He does not make or play noise and like actions are not... "gigs".

Yeah, and then we may said - everything is coincidence, chaos, there aren't any rules, tendencies - pure postmodernistic reality. We may contest what is noise and how is status of this sound in society and culture. This is a process of pluming and unification - not splintering pop culture. This topic and that one about "Missing..." show us where come from and how important are reasons of total marginalizing idea of "noise", even inside this small enclave of people who declare the same or similar taste of music.

JLIAT

#76
Quote from: ImpulsyStetoskopu on July 16, 2020, 07:57:43 AM
Why "natural" sound like working of machines/engines and other urban waves, white noise etc. which is also used in noise music, industrial ambient etc. isn't used by people  to relaxing, calm down? Do you think it is problem of taste? Physics? Cultural manipulation? A natural human's defense reaction?

Just to point out (i'll continue in the other thread as this is about Tough Guy PE / Industrial) but you can buy white noise relaxation machines, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_noise_machine, and white noise was used by the British Army in Northern to torture suspected Provisional IRA members...

Other than that, noise occurs throughout the electromagnetic spectrum, random movement of electrons, echoes of the big bang. As waves in a medium, air, water... or as waves in no medium. As for it being negative, it can be used as such or thought to be as such. Just as smoke, but smoke also can be used to signal. The idea in semiotics is the sounds of words are arbitrary (noises) but carry a meaning.  Generally noise  is thought to be negative as a disruptive phenomenon in communication. And some noise artists (unlike PE) are not seeking to communicate anything. (i've gone on too much again)

But finally some definitions of sound require a listener, which brings us to the 'tree falling in the forest' philosophical....  doh!

Which is not physics but meta-physics.... face palm!




Zeno Marx

Quote from: theotherjohn on July 16, 2020, 02:53:23 PM
History repeats itself: http://www.special-interests.net/forum/index.php?topic=2305.0
Ha!  Nobody wanted to talk about generational sociology and tendencies in that thread either, which is the key element, at least in my mind, that Warfare Noise alluded to in their post.  If people are indeed misunderstanding their heroes and context, that's where I'd look for explanation.
"the overindulgent machines were their children"
I only buy vinyl, d00ds.

theotherjohn

"Take notes from Smell & Quim" = humiliate, embarrass or degrade themselves? That seems to be the key element in the performances by them I've witnessed. Whether it's Gillham cutting himself and bleeding everywhere, Simon getting a maraca shoved up his arse, Stewart having his hair cut off, the use of repulsive props, people wearing quite frankly dangerous costumes, or being so piss drunk that you can barely stand up.

Being a "weak guy" is the flipside to being a "tough guy" I guess, and GG Allin is arguably more notorious for what he did to himself than others in the audience. There's also been Con-Dom shows where he's been dominated by women on stage and in the backing projections, so he's not making it a point to go around singling out women to beat up at every show he plays (I can't say I've ever seen him do that when I've seen him live, but maybe that says more about the audience demographics present, ha!). Even that Taiwan performance features him exposing himself like a pathetic flasher in the park.

I suppose it's all a matter of perception and it goes back to what I said about owning your own weaknesses first. Bizarre Uproar for example has certainly explored submission and domination to his own peculiar "strengths". And being punished for your sins - isn't that Christianity in a nutshell?

JLIAT

Quote from: theotherjohn on July 18, 2020, 09:50:11 AM
And being punished for your sins - isn't that Christianity in a nutshell?

No - Jesus is supposed to have taken the wrap for our sins...

But these PE antics go right back... via  The Vienna Actionists et al. to Bacchanalia, and probably further...

AnonMessAgeSage

#81
Very interesting discussion.
I think toughness for the pure sake of it has its place in Noise. Why, to the contrary, wouldn't it have a place?
Noise by its nature is a genre not at all synonymous with things of comfort.

I think the reason people would disavow the tough guy characteristic, because it makes them uncomfortable and is their nature response / defense to such behavior. Other men especially.

Assholes are not generally liked. I also think that the more hardcore genres of music distend the norms of human behavior more, because many are initially attracted to them to let loose and vent frustration.

The problem is when the "tough guy" is very clearly a persona and not at all genuine. Someone mentioned the "street cred" tough guy, and I despise such a thing. Those types have no sense of identity or purpose, they are only masculine because of certain living conditions, but they don't understand certain virtues of being a man / person, that they balance their tough guy demeanor with a fashionable personality sold to them by the same people shoving a hip-hop down their throats.

It's a shame, really, because most masculine men are of this lost and hopeless variety. It is such a rarity when you actually meet a masculine man with a refined and sophisticated taste in things obscure and of high-quality.
The average punk and metalhead are better than the average hip-hop listener, but they're still mostly lost. The more mainstream fans of Industrial are often better, but they often become one with their scene friends and all adopt a uniform sense of politics and ethics, that they lose their slight individuality with a different herd mentality.
This largely makes up the bulk of hipster politics coming into a scene that is based on transgression and extremeness, and then trying to fool their vain ego that they are iconoclasts, they cannot see their slavish nature which impels them to want to tame down extreme subcultures, and they justify it through their sense of politics and use that as an excuse and a deflection when they attempt to do this.

As a rule, the more obscure a fan base, the more sophisticated and individualistic the enthusiasts.
I can only speak of myself and to my nature. Any music I make that would be classified as "tough guy" is either based on direct experiences of my life or my twisted sense of black humor. Or both.

My cheerful and joyous nature is not usually seen in such underground circles, where the predominant attitude is apathy or misery, in the face of transgressive and taboo subjects.
I feel happiness, and dark aspects of life do not deter this at all for me.

The more obscure the genre, the more senseless it would be to use a "tough persona" because their would be less people to impres with it.
My motivation for making music is one-hundred percent a quest to bring to life certain inexplicable and often fleeting feelings and sensations of the dark aspect of the divine.
Only really recently did I start making my music available online to others, so nothing I do is ever to impress others. I cannot say much promotion has even gone into my music as distribution. I am not buying ads or anything, probably because I am rather off-put by it because the types who usually do are the rap artists who, with no sense of value or virtue, are enslaved to the wheels of the system itself, with its insistence on everybody wanting to be a fucking celebrity, or all the hood kids who insist on being flashy with their money or car, because they saw someone do it on the internet, and these people are dirt fucking poor. Always.

It would be cool to see more people who would be considered tough guys, and are also truly individuals at their core.
Most people window-show for personal identities tailored to them from internet ads, and this is clearly obvious by all the little pigeonholed categories of postmodern society, and these people are followers, they have no fucking clue who they are, yet they infiltrate iconoclastic scenes and infest it with their hipster politics.

This does make some part of the Noise scene, but even those people in it who insist upon identifying with one of the categories of modern society, they are usually more individualistic than more mainstream versions of people identifying with the same thing.

Worship of fame made it this way. Fame in and of itself is largely innocuous and what you make of it, but the NEED for it is certainly pathological, and it's characterised by people who need attention and the approval of mass amounts of strangers. The irony is that people in the underground are viewed as seeking attention, but they largely do not give a fuck how they are viewed.

I have not heard of any "hip-hop" influenced Noise, but I would not be surprised given the fact that the internet made it far easier for different genres to come into contact with each other.
A lot of phrases that pretty much everybody use, like "MOTHERFUCKER" are hip-hop inspired, but I see this more as intentionally stealing from and simultaneously mocking the lingo, at least if for if I were to say it, which is completely different from somebody who is completely serious about their urban lingo, without any irony.

So yeah, testosterone for the sake of testosterone certainly has its place in the Noise scene. But only if it's genuine, and not with the intent to impress people. And it's easy to tell the difference.

JLIAT

Quote from: theotherjohn on July 18, 2020, 11:53:56 AM
Well, even the Vienna Aktionists were relatively late to the game if you want to go down the art history route, even in their own city - look up the Wiener Gruppe/Vienna Group who did antagonistic stuff a few years before them. I recommend the book about them edited by Peter Weibel, which includes such delights as Konrad Bayer and Gerhard Ruhm's poem 'shitting and pissing' with its prototypical PE lyrics that straddles into Aristocrats territory, or the collage artworks they produced using found photographs of pornographic acts, dissected corpses, war atrocities, medical abnormalities, crude drawings of penises pointing towards a baby's anus, etc etc...

Relatively late i guess so. There is it seems a whole history of the idea of 'misrule'  and given the topic of tough guy i also guess it excludes the Maenads... proto Riot grrrls??

collapsedhole

#83
i dont often like to voice an opinion on this kind of thing.... but did this really get to 7 pages without anyone even mentioning that PE actually, probably, should be about the 'tough guy' shit? or did i just miss it - i did skim when the thread seemed to turn into the usual 'what is noise, what is sound, what is art' conversation... but if it really got this far without anyone saying that PE always has been, and always should be, about that 'tough guy' shit... then man i am really disconnected to whatever scene this is now. to me, it always has been about the 'tough guy' shit... to me, there should be no 'tough guy' sub-genre of PE - rather "PC-PE" should get the bastardized sub-genre label.

its like saying 'i like black metal - but does it always have to be about satan, suicide, wintry forests at night?' uh yes, it most certainly does!

likewise if a PE band makes some multicultural humanist peace and love anthem... personally i just wouldnt call it PE. the spirit counts for something, and counts a lot when differentiating nuances between the genres that fall under the blanket of 'noise'. and with PE that spirit should be ugly, violent, mean, intolerant, uncomfortable, depraved, etc! i mean the genre was founded on the very things some people seem to be complaining about it now. really - there is no need to compare it to, or lump it in with 'noise' like, uh, merzbow... PE is often musical, noise never is. they are similar only in their use of extreme sounds, but surely those whove been listening awhile realize the sounds are used completely different. i dont think the 'no rules in noise' angle applies to PE since i put PE more in line with music then harsh noise anyway. noise is inherently open to interpretation... PE usually strives to make its intentions known, and felt. the nastiest noise should naturally deal with the nastiest of subjects.

i cant believe the fans of pe and harash noise seem to have such distaste for the other?! surely we can all appreciate the best aspects of both, and if taboo subject matter isn't your thing then fine... but how could one say albums by taint or grunt are just 'meat head shit' just because of the subject matter. that is some serious nonsense.

those claiming it is shock tactics - another irrelovent argument which would apply only to a minority of bands that could be found in any genre. who is really shocked at this point? maybe it was shocking to you at first (i'd label it 'fascinating'), and maybe the shock has worn off to the complainers... though i'm guessing those people dont have human bones, weapons, true crime memorabilia, fetish pornography and a stash of hard drugs next to your soon-to-be-sold PE records about those same subjects... but many of us do, and have for as long or longer then we've had the PE collection. and neither are going anywhere!


JLIAT

#84
Quote from: collapsedhole on July 18, 2020, 02:18:13 PM
i dont often like to voice an opinion on this kind of thing.... but did this really get to 7 pages without anyone even mentioning that PE actually, probably, should be about the 'tough guy' shit? or did i just miss it - i did skim when the thread seemed to turn into the usual 'what is noise, what is sound, what is art' conversation... but if it really got this far without anyone saying that PE always has been, and always should be, about that 'tough guy' shit... then man i am really disconnected to whatever scene this is now. to me, it always has been about the 'tough guy' shit... to me, there should be no 'tough guy' sub-genre of PE - rather "PC-PE" should get the bastardized sub-genre label.

its like saying 'i like black metal - but does it always have to be about satan, suicide, wintry forests at night?' uh yes, it most certainly does!

likewise if a PE band makes some multicultural humanist peace and love anthem... personally i just wouldnt call it PE. the spirit counts for something, and counts a lot when differentiating nuances between the genres that fall under the blanket of 'noise'. and with PE that spirit should be ugly, violent, mean, intolerant, uncomfortable, depraved, etc! i mean the genre was founded on the very things some people seem to be complaining about it now. really - there is no need to compare it to, or lump it in with 'noise' like, uh, merzbow... PE is often musical, noise never is. they are similar only in their use of extreme sounds, but surely those whove been listening awhile realize the sounds are used completely different. i dont think the 'no rules in noise' angle applies to PE since i put PE more in line with music then harsh noise anyway. noise is inherently open to interpretation... PE usually strives to make its intentions known, and felt. the nastiest noise should naturally deal with the nastiest of subjects.

i cant believe the fans of pe and harash noise seem to have such distaste for the other?! surely we can all appreciate the best aspects of both, and if taboo subject matter isn't your thing then fine... but how could one say albums by taint or grunt are just 'meat head shit' just because of the subject matter. that is some serious nonsense.

those claiming it is shock tactics - another irrelovent argument which would apply only to a minority of bands that could be found in any genre. who is really shocked at this point? maybe it was shocking to you at first (i'd label it 'fascinating'), and maybe the shock has worn off to the complainers... though i'm guessing those people dont have human bones, weapons, true crime memorabilia, fetish pornography and a stash of hard drugs next to your soon-to-be-sold PE records about those same subjects... but many of us do, and have for as long or longer then we've had the PE collection. and neither are going anywhere!



I could agree with much of this, and it would be for those into P.E. to say otherwise. I did compare P.E. to Expressionism, and noise to Abstract Expressionism to get a feel for the difference. The latter not being related to (violent)  human feelings. And i did say this could be what is identified as a rift. Noise, HN being in S.Mckinley's term thought of as more 'pure', conversely those into PE / Expressionism that this is more "Real". You dont get the visceral notions of say a Francis Bacon painting in a Barnett Newman.



C601


impulse manslaughter

Quote from: collapsedhole on July 18, 2020, 02:18:13 PMif a PE band makes some multicultural humanist peace and love anthem... personally i just wouldnt call it PE. the spirit counts for something, and counts a lot when differentiating nuances between the genres that fall under the blanket of 'noise'. and with PE that spirit should be ugly, violent, mean, intolerant, uncomfortable, depraved, etc! i mean the genre was founded on the very things some people seem to be complaining about it now. really - there is no need to compare it to, or lump it in with 'noise' like, uh, merzbow... PE is often musical, noise never is. they are similar only in their use of extreme sounds, but surely those whove been listening awhile realize the sounds are used completely different. i dont think the 'no rules in noise' angle applies to PE since i put PE more in line with music then harsh noise anyway. noise is inherently open to interpretation... PE usually strives to make its intentions known, and felt. the nastiest noise should naturally deal with the nastiest of subjects.

If power electronics as a genre has these strict limitations it'll only repeat itself in an endless circle and the very effective shock tactics of the first and second waves will get boring very fast. I guess we all have a weak spot for violence & gore but for me the contemporary standout acts usually offer a different view. Like the overlooked æþel electronics LP from last year which didn't really stand out sound wise but the medieval theme made me come back for more.

Also, covering tough subjects (produce vile sounds, write a few lyrics about rape and murder and cut 'n paste a few corpses/concentration camps) does not make you a tough guy. On the contrary, 90% of evil black metal warriors, PE-nihilists or RAC-hooligans turn out to be friendly nerds when you meet them in person. Other 10% are usually assholes and maybe a few tough guys. Not saying this is good or bad, just my personal experience.

Atrophist

Quote

...
likewise if a PE band makes some multicultural humanist peace and love anthem... personally i just wouldnt call it PE. the spirit counts for something, and counts a lot when differentiating nuances between the genres that fall under the blanket of 'noise'. and with PE that spirit should be ugly, violent, mean, intolerant, uncomfortable, depraved ...

Just to make sure I understood your point: if you consider the energy and the attitude in PE to be the decisive factor, would music that has the requisite spirit, but not the "typical" PE sound, still to be within the PE spectrum?

burdizzo

I think you're being deliberately disingenuous.

FreakAnimalFinland

Quote from: Atrophist on July 19, 2020, 03:45:24 AM
Just to make sure I understood your point: if you consider the energy and the attitude in PE to be the decisive factor, would music that has the requisite spirit, but not the "typical" PE sound, still to be within the PE spectrum?

Even if this could be disingenous, I think it is still relevant question. Many times you get the notion that noise+vocals = power electronics. It has been recently expressed on topics and this seems how it is perceived by a lot of new people. I do not think that mentioned equation is correct. Just surface level. Without context it will be just noise+vocals = noise. Which is not a bad thing. It can be even as great thing as Masonna and Incapacitants.
E-mail: fanimal +a+ cfprod,com
MAGAZINE: http://www.special-interests.net
LABEL / DISTRIBUTION: FREAK ANIMAL http://www.nhfastore.net